A new book is now available free online titled Call No Man Master, written by Joyce Collin-Smith.

The author has had “fifty years of spiritual adventures” and offers “praise of teachers,” but warns to be “wary of gurus.”

One of the gurus she warns about is Maharishi Mahesh Yogi.

Collin-Smith was one of his early disciples, so she “knew him when.”

A reader recently told CultNews.com the following:

“Chapters 9 to 14 give a detailed description of the early years in which Maharishi established himself in England.

The author passed through a variety of spiritual movements and spent about 8 to 10 years meditating with Maharishi and also served in some capacity as his administrator.

Her period of involvement was from 1960 to about 1968-70.

Fascinating and valuable descriptions of how Maharishi got his start in England.

The author provides convincing evidence that his Transcendental Meditation (TM) may have caused damage and passivity, from the very beginning.

Collin-Smith also offers a fairly convincing case that the guru was an imposter, basically a monastic washout who failed to get a promotion in India, who then sought to re-invent himself as a ‘Realized Master’ in the West. And then marketed that persona to less discerning and more gullible audiences.

It seems significant that Maharishi did not minister to the more knowledgeable émigré Indian community in London, but instead concentrated on Westerners, that probably could not tell a bogus yogi from a real one.

Collin-Smith appears to demonstrate that from the outset Maharishi was greedy for money and that he seemingly ruthlessly used and discarded followers. The guru also apparently showed no concern when people began breaking down as a result of practicing TM.

The author says that though Maharishi might have some special gift, he abused it. And of course, how the guru struck gold when he was able to latch onto the Beatles.”

Collin-Smith claims to have suffered personal injury as a result of her years of TM practice and reports that many artists she knew also had their careers derailed because of this form of meditation.

She also discusses how TM-related passivity and depression may have disabled people’s critical faculties.”

The author writes, “The stream of creative energy, once so vigorous and prolific in me, had been dammed, diverted or even destroyed altogether. I therefore had no source of happiness and satisfaction. Judging by the conversations I had with various artists, writers, musicians and a ballet dancer, this experience of the meditation effects was shared with them. ‘The ballet used to be my life. Now it’s just the way I earn my living.’ ‘I don’t seem to want to paint any more. I’d rather just sit in the sun.’ ‘I can’t get on with writing my book. I don’t seem to feel much interest in anything but TM,’ were some of the comments I heard.”

Note: This book, now made easily accessible through the Internet, provides thought-provoking information for anyone interested in the early history of Maharishi and/or the origins of TM.

A new book is now available free online titled Call No Man Master, written by Joyce Collin-Smith.

The author has had “fifty years of spiritual adventures” and offers “praise of teachers,” but warns to be “wary of gurus.”

One of the gurus she warns about is Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Collin-Smith was one of his early disciples and so she “knew him when.”

A reader recently told Cult News.com the following:

“Chapters 9 to 14 give a detailed description of the early years in which Maharishi established himself in England.

The author passed through a variety of spiritual movements and spent about 8 to 10 years meditating with Maharishi and also served in some capacity as his administrator.

Her period of involvement was from 1960 to about 1968-70.

Fascinating and valuable descriptions of how Maharishi got his start in England.

The author provides convincing evidence that his Transcendental Meditation (TM) may have produced dissociative reactions and passivity, from the very beginning.

Collin-Smith also offers a fairly convincing case that the guru was an imposter, basically a monastic washout who failed to get a promotion in India, who then sought to re-invent himself as a ‘Realized Master’ in the West. And then marketing that persona to less discerning and more gullible audiences.

It seems significant that Maharishi did not minister to the more knowledgeable émigré Indian community in London, but instead concentrated on Westerners, that probably could not tell a bogus yogi from a real one.

Collin-Smith appears to demonstrate that from the outset Maharishi was greedy for money and that he seemingly ruthlessly used and discard followers. The guru also apparently showed no concern when people began breaking down as a result of practicing TM.

The author says that though Maharishi might have some special gift, he abused it. And of course, how the guru struck gold when he was able to latch onto the Beatles.”

Collin-Smith claims to have suffered personal injury as a result of her years of TM practice and reports that many artists she knew also had their careers derailed because of this form of meditation.

She also discusses how TM-related passivity and depression may have disabled people’s critical faculties.”

The author writes, “The stream of creative energy, once so vigorous and prolific in me, had been dammed, diverted or even destroyed altogether. I therefore had no source of happiness and satisfaction. Judging by the conversations I had with various artists, writers, musicians and a ballet dancer, this experience of the meditation effects was shared with them. ‘The ballet used to be my life. Now it’s just the way I earn my living.’ ‘I don’t seem to want to paint any more. I’d rather just sit in the sun.’ ‘I can’t get on with writing my book. I don’t seem to feel much interest in anything but TM,’ were some of the comments I heard.”

This book, now made easily accessible through the Internet, provides thought-provoking information for anyone interested in the early history of Maharishi and/or the origins of the TM.

When it comes to cash, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi perhaps the worlds richest guru, has so much he’s apparently out looking for investment opportunities.

One such opportunity popped up through a piece of prime property located within one of Chicago’s historic districts, reports the Sun-Times.

Maharishi’s business arm, called “Maharishi Global Development,” is now engaged in the expensive renovation of a 22-story Blackstone building, which it is refurbishing into 39 luxury condos.

The estimated cost is $135 million.

How does this project promote the guru’s vaunted goal of world peace?

Developing luxury condominiums for the rich in a historic downtown neighborhood is certainly a savvy business move. But how does that achieve progress for humanity along the spiritual path outlined by Maharishi for planetary salvation?

Well, maybe “global development” actually means real estate development?

The guru seems to be meditating on a business plan to enhance his burgeoning investment portfolio, rather than the often-stated goal of global harmony.

It seems that Jehovah’s Witnesses have achieved a status within the pages of the New York Times, previously denied them.

In a New York Times Obituary regarding the death of a prominent Witness leader and corporate president, the newspaper described the organization as “a Christian denomination founded in the late 19th century.”

Well, at least they got the time of their origin right.

However, historically no Christian denomination has ever officially recognized Jehovah’s Witnesses as a “Christian denomination.”

Instead Witnesses have a long history of controversy and basic doctrinal differences with Christians.

Some Christians even consider the organization a “cult.”

The Witnesses reject Christian observances such as Christmas and Easter, as “pagan” holidays.

They have consistently remained outside of established Christianity and instead have chosen their own unique blend of religious beliefs.

Never mind.

The NY Times seems to think they are a “Christian denomination” without qualification, so it seems at least through the so-called “paper of record,” they have achieved a new status.

Note: A Newsday Obituary made the same mistake, reporting that the Witnesses are simply a “Christian group,” without making any further distinctions.

Doesn’t anyone at these papers proof or fact check the obituary section?