By Brian Birmingham
There is a new development in the child abuse case at the Hare Krishna TKG Academy in Dallas, Texas.
Documents obtained by CultNews reveal that the parents of the abused child did not immediately report the abuse when they were questioned by hospital staff and authorities.
ISKCON’s Child Protection Office did complete a report confirming the abuse, but it is not clear if that written report was copied to Child Protective Services (CPS) in Dallas.
See the official report by ISKCON’s Child Protection Office.
See this detailed narrative compiled by the family of the abused child.
But both parents of the abused child failed to explain what happened when questioned by child protective services and medical personnel. Sadly, they lied to CPS and the hospital staff, in order to protect the school and the Hare Krishna community in Dallas.Failure to pursue the child abuse may have occurred at multiple levels.
First, and foremost, ISKCON CPO, which was created to protect children, had a responsibility to share their report with the authorities in Texas, and to demand definitive action be taken by the temple in Dallas.
It must be noted that at the end of the ISKCON CPO report it states, “Case was reported to local Dallas child protective services (CPS). No further action was taken by CPS once they determined that Rasakeli was no longer teaching at TKG Academy, and Ramananda was no longer under Rasakeli’s care.”
But what does “case reported” mean?
CultNews cannot confirm that ISKCON’s final report was sent directly to CPS.
Someone may have reported something to CPS, but Dallas CPS would not confirm who reported the abuse. Only that there is a record.
CultNews has made a record request, which is now pending, to determine the details.
The family claims that they offered to share medical records related to the abuse with the Dallas temple.
Here is what the father stated online:
“Jan[uary] late Jan[uary] – Social services/social worker calls our home asking about abuse, if our child was being abused and questioning if he had access to the restroom, and when was he potty trained, etc. They said that such frequent UTI’s [urinary tract infections] are not normal in a boy and is also a common sign of a child being in a situation of where they are being abused. Doctors had also expressed concern about the dangerous bacteria that had been found in his urine. We do not, at that time, provide any information about the school and Rasakeli [the abusuive teacher] not letting Ramananda use the bathroom in fear of causing trouble with the school. We did speak with the school and started mentioning the concerns from doctors and how they had social workers call us asking questions. We also asked both school principal and school board if they needed to see the hospital papers or speak with the doctors, they never reply.”
Here is the mission statement of the CPO according to its website:“Our mission is to protect the children of Srila Prabhupada’s Movement from child abuse and neglect. By doing so, we strengthen the future of the Movement —the children—while providing an example to the world of a spiritual society that practices compassionate caring and protection.”
See ISKCON Child Protection Office
However, it appears that ISKCON’s CPO failed to take decisive direct action by actively encouraging and insisting upon a criminal investigation regarding child abuse as no criminal charges are evident.
And apparently the Dallas Hare Krishna Temple has done little to punish the teacher that abused the minor child, who remains within the Dallas Hare Krishna community.
So, how effective is the ISKCON Child Protection Office?
Is it adequately protecting the children of ISKCON from child abuse and neglect, or is its purpose rather public relations through investigations that accomplish nothing definitive?
ISKCON seems to be more concerned about lawsuits than protecting its children.
The abusive teacher at the Dallas Hare Krishna school was found guilty of child abuse by the ISKCON CPO. So why isn’t she being criminally charged and/or purged from the community?
It must be noted that according to sources inside the Dallas Hare Krishna community the Dallas temple leaders sought to have the CPO report findings reversed.
Is the Dallas temple more concerned with protecting its children from abuse or protecting its teacher and silencing criticism?
The safety of children must come first, or so ISKCON has publicly stated.Have the leaders of the Dallas Hare Krishna Temple learned nothing from their past mistakes?
Has ISKCON learned anything from the personal injury lawsuits that forced the organization into bankruptcy?
It seems that neither ISKCON nor the local temple in Dallas have genuinely learned much from the past mistakes, which hurt so many people. And apparently these religious institutions plagued in the past by child abuse scandals, may continue to have the same problems in the future.
Does ISKCON mandate reporting to the CPS and local police when a child is abused?
Or instead simply paper over such abuse by producing a report from its CPO, with no specific policy of mandated reporting to authorities by its affiliated temples?
What is the meaningful outcome and consequence of child abuse within ISKCON?
Will there be criminal charges far all of those found guilty of child abuse?
How does ISKCON’s CPO and its affiliated temples actually protect Krishna kids?
CultNews has updated this report based upon the latest disclosures from Dallas CPS and will continue to do so as records are delivered and further scrutinized.
Note: Brian Birmingham is a graduate of the University of Massachusetts in Boston with a BA in Psychology and Sociology. He is a native of Dallas.